@Tapio
display of points on the map ... hmm let's try one experiment. Instead of "com.asamm.locus.ACTION_TASK", send "com.asamm.locus.DATA_TASK" action with the following extra
"data" instead of "tasks"
content:
I've not tested it, but it should work .
@slarti76
OruxMaps ... funny comment @Tapio . Unfortunately, I believe there will still be more than slarti .
This is a general topic where all sorts of problems and features are discussed. Most of us use only a minority of what Locus Map can do, but -> when it's implemented and it does not work, it should be fixed (or removed for good), even if used only by a single person.
Back to problem > fix with the "map name" was only aesthetic. I'm also testing one Oruxmap and it works without a problem. Do you have this issue with all such maps?
display of points on the map ... hmm let's try one experiment. Instead of "com.asamm.locus.ACTION_TASK", send "com.asamm.locus.DATA_TASK" action with the following extra
"data" instead of "tasks"
content:
Code Select
{
map_point: {
"name": "Point name",
"icon": "internal icon name, file:// path or full URL",
"lon": 14.1456,
"lat": 50.4564,
"action_after": "optional, one of CENTER, CENTER_ANIMATE, OPEN_DETAIL"
}
}
I've not tested it, but it should work .
@slarti76
OruxMaps ... funny comment @Tapio . Unfortunately, I believe there will still be more than slarti .
This is a general topic where all sorts of problems and features are discussed. Most of us use only a minority of what Locus Map can do, but -> when it's implemented and it does not work, it should be fixed (or removed for good), even if used only by a single person.
Back to problem > fix with the "map name" was only aesthetic. I'm also testing one Oruxmap and it works without a problem. Do you have this issue with all such maps?