[Theme] Tapiola

Tapio · December 23, 2023, 07:14:38

I hope it's immediately clear what this is about.
You cannot view this attachment.

No release yet, but changes in https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TapioOfTapiola/oam_theme_tapiola/main/Tapiola.xml

Tapio · December 23, 2023, 15:58:50

@Andrew, Re: Hobart bridge.

The cycleway is painted at the right place. But there's 3 relations (togglable in my theme via "Cycling network"). One on bridge center, one on both cycleways.

Problem: I display them with an offset, because in the theme hiking relations are on one side, cycling in other side of roads. I want to keep this system. In case of this bridge it gets a bit messy.

Screenshots, without relations, with offset, without offset.

This can only be solved by centering the relations, but then displaying hiking + cycling at the same time is difficult. Need to think about it.

EDIT: Nah, it should be OK. Offset only a thing in high zooms. I have tamed them. Please try latest release. I like it now.

Btw, it was a full line by accident. Now it's striped (rcn|lcn|ocn), full=icn/ncn

Tapio · December 23, 2023, 16:29:55

v1.3.8

Visibility cycling route captions
Dependency markers in menu
Visibility industrial area captions
Industrial area captions part of suburb name display
Fine tuned hiking/cycling relation offsets

"Dependency markers": without the above parent option checked, the child option will not display.

Andrew Heard · December 23, 2023, 22:22:59

Unfortunately I still have issues with that test bridge. Theme displayed on dashboard at top/left corner. All relevant theme tick boxes are ticked.
You cannot view this attachment.

Tapio · December 24, 2023, 13:44:06

Hi Andrew, I can't change it, it's specific and due to the way the mappers have drawn the bridge plus my offset.

The equivalent of my striped line in Johns theme is the semi transparent white line on the center of the bridge.

If we center the line you won't see a problem. But adding an offset you can see, there is a short part appearing in the south. While in the north there is a longer line, over the whole bridge.

Andrew Heard · December 24, 2023, 22:39:25

Quote from: Tapio on December 24, 2023, 13:44:06it's specific and due to the way the mappers have drawn the bridge

@Tapio - that's OK - it was kind of you to attempt. Is there some problem with how the bridge ways are described? It was me that added the north side footpath/ cycleway, with some nervousness, being alongside a major highway, but maybe it can be improved.

Saturo · December 28, 2023, 19:24:31

Quote from: Tapio on December 16, 2023, 21:30:40
Quote from: Saturo on December 16, 2023, 20:58:32I miss the orange paths shown on the screenshots.
Those are SAC1 and I remember now, I used a super thin line there, you see it in your screenshot. Reason: SAC1 is unfortunately used by mappers in flat, even urban areas at times. There the underlying path is of higher interest.

Thanks for your explanation. I think i will stay with FzOam or Elevate theme porque me gusta más.

Gesendet von meinem SM-G990U1 mit Tapatalk

Henk van der Spek · December 29, 2023, 19:03:02

I was exploring the region near Faro Portugal for our next hike. Using "all features" of your nice theme, activating protected areas gives an unwanted effect. See the screenshots.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn moto g82 5G met Tapatalk

Tapio · December 29, 2023, 20:47:51

Quote from: Henk van der Spek on December 29, 2023, 19:03:02I was exploring the region near Faro Portugal for our next hike. Using "all features" of your nice theme, activating protected areas gives an unwanted effect

Please try https://raw.githubusercontent.com/TapioOfTapiola/oam_theme_tapiola/main/Tapiola.xml
(replace it inside the zip)
Edit: Still changes needed to protected area overlays, for better visibility in forest areas.

Henk van der Spek · December 30, 2023, 09:58:20

I am old and rusty and no IT guru, so would not know how to do that. Sorry.

Tapio · December 30, 2023, 14:37:14

Quote from: Henk van der Spek on December 30, 2023, 09:58:20I am old and rusty and no IT guru, so would not know how to do that. Sorry.

OK, then try the attached one.

Henk van der Spek · December 30, 2023, 19:53:41

Thanks. Definitely a step forward. Especially on my normal zoom levels.The green could still be slightly more transparent.
You cannot view this attachment.You cannot view this attachment.

Tapio · December 30, 2023, 22:55:06

Quote from: Henk van der Spek on December 30, 2023, 19:53:41The green could still be slightly more transparent.

Hmm. It looks different on my LM4, see attachments. On my smartphone, this overlay is already barely visible in forest areas.

Tapio · December 30, 2023, 23:07:40

I can add a border around protected areas, but that will also result in some unwanted lines (renderer problem).

Henk van der Spek · December 31, 2023, 09:49:58

Ok. Since LM4 is the future, better leave it at that. The border in the bottom shot is helpfull but not preferable for me if it brings the renderer lines at the top shot zoomfactor.
I tried my phone's color settings but that dit not help.
I am aware of this setting now and more alert, so no further problem with it. I'll add two shots from a nearby wet moor area at home. There you see that the difference is much smaller, nearly too small.