[Theme] Tapiola

[Tapio]

Yes I think paths are rendered as dashed all around, here it felt misleading for me.
And it takes the bicycle designation into account,hence blue.

[Tapio]

v1.2.0

• Minor changes
• Paths (usually dashed lines) with asphalt/paved/concrete drawn like streets. With blue lines.

[Tapio]

v1.2.1

• Unified some path colors and sizes
• Better visibility of private/restricted ways (red instead of grey lines)
• Optional display of access restrictions
• Fix: paths/footways which weren't drawn

[Henk van der Spek]

Thank you. I had one nice hike with it already. Easy on the eyes. Shortly I will use it in the hopefully sunny Alps.
In the startpost you write: LM4 required but here with classic 3.68.2 it works great too. Installation is easy too. Download the zip file, tap on it and Classic opens with the usual questions and installs it.

Verstuurd vanaf mijn moto g82 5G met Tapatalk

[Tapio]

In the startpost you write: LM4 required but here with classic 3.68.2 it works great too.

Ah... is LM3 able to use Mapsforge V4+ maps? Do you use OAM maps?

[Henk van der Spek]

In the startpost you write: LM4 required but here with classic 3.68.2 it works great too.

Ah... is LM3 able to use Mapsforge V4+ maps? Do you use OAM maps?

Sorry, Dont't know. I only use the latest OAM maps (V5).

[john_percy]

In the startpost you write: LM4 required but here with classic 3.68.2 it works great too.

Ah... is LM3 able to use Mapsforge V4+ maps? Do you use OAM maps?

Sorry, Dont't know. I only use the latest OAM maps (V5).

Both LM3 and LM4 can use the latest OAM maps. Obviously you get a better result with a theme designed for OAM.
Both LM3 and LM4 can display the latest Lomaps, using the same renderer and themes as for OAM maps, though once again you get best results with a theme designed for Lomaps or for both OAM maps and Lomaps.
Both LM3 and LM4 can display older Lomaps with Locus's own renderer. Themes have to be designed for older Lomaps or they won't show on the theme selector.

[Tapio]

I reverted a track size change which does not make 100% sense. Tracks, grade1-grade5, are displayed wider than small roads. You may notice it if they connect.
It's much needed IMO, because of the tracks visibility in forests. It's much better there.
Lots of fiddling with the tiny things 😊

[Tapio]

v1.2.2

• Unification of hiking + cycling network styles. Like hiking, cycling networks are now split into more and less important ones. Dashed lines on the less important networks.

[Tapio]

v1.2.3

• Allow to toggle road names
• Windmill ZL, fix
• Parking area not displayed, fix

All power to the user 😀 You can have your map look like in the screenshot, if you need that (no city- and road names).

[Tapio]

v1.2.4

• Fixed non-round street endings
• Improved overlapping track/byway which looked like being bridges
• Code/Comment cleanup
• Waterways drain/ditch/stream lines=cubic
• Private parking icon red-ish

Changed icon can only be seen after Locus cache delete (Locus settings).

[Agus]

v1.2.4

• Fixed non-round street endings
• Improved overlapping track/byway which looked like being bridges
• Code/Comment cleanup
• Waterways drain/ditch/stream lines=cubic
• Private parking icon red-ish

Changed icon can only be seen after Locus cache delete (Locus settings).

Hello.
Congratulations on your theme.
Do you plan to add "cubic" to the rivers as you did with the streams?

Best regards
You cannot view this attachment.

[Tapio]

Do you plan to add "cubic" to the rivers as you did with the streams?

Tendency is: No. But I am not sure about the consequences. I think there may be footways/cycleways close to rivers, which then aren't aligned perfectly, or worse, get hidden below the river.

EDIT: A clear no. Author of Voluntary theme will undo such changes for rivers. Non-connected parts may happen, or bridges at the wrong place.

[Agus]

Do you plan to add "cubic" to the rivers as you did with the streams?

Tendency is: No. But I am not sure about the consequences. I think there may be footways/cycleways close to rivers, which then aren't aligned perfectly, or worse, get hidden below the river.

EDIT: A clear no. Author of Voluntary theme will undo such changes for rivers. Non-connected parts may happen, or bridges at the wrong place.

You are right. I discovered an error in the Voluntary theme

You cannot view this attachment.

[Mick FU]

Hi Tapio,
First, I would thank you for this theme, which I use now quite often. It is very clear.

Second, I have a question, surely off topic, as same behaviour is happening with all theme. Don't hesitate to tell me and I will open a new topic 

I discovered a place where there is a fountain (in real), and despite the search I can do in Locus, enabling everything in themes, or search in points (online or offline) nothing is found nor displayed on map. But information is there in OSM (I use Openandromap for France).
It is this fountain :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300121927

I am attaching screenshots from OSM (in Vespucci app), and Locus.

You cannot view this attachment.

You cannot view this attachment.

Thanks in advance.