Re: [APP] - version 4.34.+ ( 05/2026 )

[Menion]

New Locus Map (4) version

Important links
- list of news of public versions
- Public versions
- Beta versions

Versions
13. 5. 2026 - Locus Map 4.34.0

[WildWortWechsel]

Hi Menion,

thank you for the new version. The start is stable even with many tracks on the map.

I like the elavation view on the upper frame so the trail is visible.

The halo for long trails is not optimal but ok. In principle I like the new halo.

Greetings and have a nice day!

Edit: Added screenshot.

[Graf Geo]

Thanks for the new relase version! It's made a good impression so far!

Regarding track highlighting: We could experiment with this a bit more, but the current effect is perfectly acceptable.
However, there are two line colours where, strangely, the arrows are white (and therefore hard to see) when highlighting, even though black would make more sense: cyan and light green (see screenshot).
But that's not an issue.

Edit: I can now see the more discreet "data bubbles" above the charts; they no longer cover them up. Very good!

Have a lovely weekend from me too!

[Menion]

I'm glad it works fine, super!

About highlight ... @WildWortWechsel , hmm it should not look like this, damn! Guys, if you, anyone, share a track over "Share by link", I'll gladly look at it!

[WildWortWechsel]

I'm glad it works fine, super!

About highlight ... @WildWortWechsel , hmm it should not look like this, damn! Guys, if you, anyone, share a track over "Share by link", I'll gladly look at it!

The track is on the way ...

[Graf Geo]

Now that the charts have been improved so nicely, here's another request or suggestion:

The labels partially cover large areas of the two bar charts for way types and surfaces (see screenshot).
Perhaps the labels could be placed above the charts here too, as is the case with the other charts.

It would be even better if these bar charts could also be included in the chart overview so that they can be zoomed in on as well. For longer routes, they have always been too compressed, which makes analysis difficult.

[Andrew Heard]

bar charts could also be included in the chart overview so that they can be zoomed in on as well. For longer routes, they have always been too compressed, which makes analysis difficult.

great suggestions; my use-case - 80km route for day with tiny 200m unsealed which I'm interested to decide further, but super difficult at present w/o zoom to determine where on the map/ route this section really is
 

[Andrew Heard]

4.34: @menion - this behavior started with the new chart system - track > chart > tap "+" a few times without tapping elsewhere on the chart > now single-finger-drag on the X axis instead of the chart body > observe that the chart is further zoomed instead of panned - is this intended behavior? I am using X axis: time. Sometimes while panning until near end of the chart then further dragging results in zooming until the X scale is hugely magnified. Quite confusing. Have to unzoom & start again. It is a little difficult to reproduce, I don't fully understand the "trick" yet.

As discussed in 4.33, from the chart, tapping the Map icon does not position the map at the currently selected position on the chart.

Is 4.34 a record for most changes?

[Graf Geo]

@Andrew Heard:

I can't quite understand the issue with zooming on the x-axis, nor can I reproduce it.

Map icon in the chart overview: The map centres correctly on the position I click on in the chart. The only thing that doesn't work: I click on the track on the map, e.g. at the start of the track. The track info panel opens with the elevation chart, and the position at the start of the track is correctly marked there. Then I open the chart overview and click on a different position, e.g. a peak of a hill. Clicking the map icon takes me back to the map, which is now correctly centred on the peak. However, the track info panel is still open, and the old position at the start of the track is still marked on the elevation graph there. So it isn't updated. But that's not a big deal.

"Most change record": I thought the same thing. 😉