Messages

Link doesn't work ...

Ok, Thanks a lot! (btw historic day for us 

Popej, I also tried to display proposed routes which are included in your map:
      <osm-tag key="state" value="proposed" zoom-appear="12" />

I tried many combinations and I can't display them anyway. Here is last combination I tried:

   <rule e="way" k="state" v="proposed">
      <line stroke="#FF0000" stroke-width="10" stroke-linecap="butt" />
   </rule>

Maybe someone could help with this one?

Here's an example proposed route
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2470458

That explains everything. Good move, I didn't check the history but now I can see it had the same colour as buildings

To be honest I don't know. By the way, if you will filter it out could you also add these tags tag-mapping.xml?
-incline
-mtb:scale:uphill
-footway=crossing and cycleway=crossing (I want to add zebras for combinations like here http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232025392 )
Thanks in advance. 

Nice find  I checked on few different themes and it is visible too. Any chance to exclude it from your map?

Thanks 
Popej, I found a bug inyour ap(probably some rendering issue).
Here's a link to a video showing this bug. Something is wrong withbackground, area is preety big, Its near Lodz.
http://www22.zippyshare.com/v/68012870/file.html

Can I make a wish for cyclists? I would like to have some more informations on Locus and CT maps.
I compared OpenAndromaps Poland with Locus and CT map with one theme. Maybe I did something wrong with Locus and CT map? Please have a look.
@popej,
do you plan a Germany map?

Missing cycle route - it's because this map is old...probably from september and Ct is the latest (October)

Edit:
Are the mtb uphill arrows based on incline tag? If not they can be displayed randomly, not in the direction of incline bacause mtb uphill scale tag doesn't include a direction.

I'm almost finished with my beta 1 version of a theme. The only thing I'm struggling with is when 2 different routes of a same type (i.e. lcn) belong to the same road, the path text are displayed on each other and very often they become unreadable. Actually there is a small workaround for it but only for 2 different relation (i.e. rcn and lcn on the same road can be displayed separately by using dx attribute). Is there any solution for this?

http://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?topic=3976.msg30010#msg30010
Here's a link for testing. Colour coded BICYCLE routes are only shown on popej's map...I'm not sure why?

Popej, great job! And fast as usual Now it's all fine. I'm developing a new theme containing parts of andromaps and V-scale themes and of course my customization. It is focused on bicycle trails in Poland. It also contains hiking trials. I'm not exactly sure if I can post it, I don't want to make some people angry at me for coping their work (well, not 100% coping Anyone developing andromaps is here? Jusc, are you ok with that?

Sure. This example shows 1 walking route with black colour and 2 lcn bike routes without colour.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297743532
I think that erasing trails without colour isn't a good idea. Sometimes you may find routes without colours but marked in a specific way. The more routes the better. I use a neutral colour for routes without colour specification. These should also be visible on the map. My theme should include them

Popej I'm not exactly sure but the thing is you can set the different widths for primary|tertiary etc and different for paths and tracks. It makes map more readable. I also noticed that some routes are not visible on your maps and it's not themes fault. For example if you have a part of a track with 2 lcn on it, only one is visible. But if you have rcn,lcn and for example nwn all 3 are rendered. It's probably some error that 2 routes of the same type are not saved in a map? I hope you know what I mean

I understand. Right now the part of the code I posted earlier is understood only by andromaps...So there is probably some different combination used...I'm not exactly sure how it was done yet.

That would be great if you could do that Popej. But maybe there is a workaround?

Because there are different rules for icn/rcn/lcn etc. for zoom levels 0-13. I would like to see different route widths for wider roads like primary etc. and smaller for paths, tracks....