Messages

Thanks for the screenshots.
I hadn't really understood the actual question that well in your long video with your own local [EN] version.
My hearing is already not as optimal as it once was, and I do speak a mother tongue other than EN(US)
Basic [EN] with very good articulation as the school teacher(s) may teach it can just about do it ;-)

The screenshots.
If the source material you are going to cut and weld is not 100% exactly the same, so  you will see this in the result.

So first you took a piece away from the original track, the path that runs along the lake.
Then you designed a new part of the track which will run along that highway.  Correct?

This newly designed segment will then be placed in the empty "hole". At the welding places you will see small deviations.
It doesn't bother me at all....but admittedly it is not the perfection that you apparently expect here.
However, since there is no new complete track routing, these small deviations are not corrected.
Welding tracks together is a surgical job that you need to do partly manually and quite precisely.
I don't want to start such a complex and lengthy "welding" process. This example convinces me even more.

Imo you can more comfortably just redesign the whole trajectory through (a) new B_router routing.
By means of a retrace function where you place the original tracks as a reference template in the background.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

The attached tracks do consist out of multiple tracksegments.

By Topografix gpx 1.1 (http://www.topografix.com)

A Track Segment holds a list of Track Points which are logically connected in order.
To represent a single GPS track where GPS reception was lost, or the GPS receiver was turned off, start a new Track Segment for each continuous span of track data.

There are two common approaches to deal (display) a GPX track with multiple track segments:

1. DISPLAY.
- By Plotaroute, RWGPS, RTWtool, Garmin programs
- Ignore it so just connect the segments and show as a single track.
- Not correct imo as otherwise tracksegments had not te be invented.
   
2. DISPLAY.
- By Locus, Gpx editor, Gps Visualizer, Gps Prune, Gps Track Editor, GpXSee, Google Earth(kml), B_router web MyGPSFiles, gpxeditor.co.uk,
-  Show a gap between segments, so it does look like different tracks
-  All points inside a segment are drawn as one continous line..
-  A single track however can contain out of multiple segments.

Does the gap bother you visually? Functionally anyway, it just remains one track with some fully transparent straight connecting lines between the track segments. 
"You" can also 'stitch' them together in a slightly different way so that there is no visual gap in actual Locus and other apps.

@ Menion.
https://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?topic=7831.msg67007#msg67007
I will report back, so here is the result. 
https:// will be added.  = Confirmed by the RouteYou developper

[Wenn]

Wenn (not yet) der Locus BRouter track jedoch ALLE Planungspunkte als Shaping oder Via beibehält, kann mann, wenn Sie möchten, auch später bequem segment teile ändern mit so nur geringem risiko, die gesamte ursprüngliche trackpath zu zerstören, da der ursprünglichen referenz planungspunkte allen perfect erhalten bleiben. Insbesondere bei Rundreisen verhindert dies auch, dass Sie nach einer automatischen Neuberechnung mit Punktpriorität einen sehr kurzen Routenvorschlag direkt zum Endziel erhalten.

[Kurviger-Universum]

Das ist natürlich völlig richtig, Steffen.
Ich verweise nur auf die hervorragende Unterstützung von sowohl Shaping Points als auch von Via Points in dass "Kurviger-Universum".
Ein Kurviger-Track-Export mit abbiegerichtungen ist so nur mit dem eigene privat entwickelten .kurviger-Track-Dateiformat möglich.
Aber auch Locus könnte dies genauso gut mit dem beliebteren einfachen gpx trackformat so tun.
Das alles so hinzufügen zu einem gpx-Track auf richtige robuste und sehr einfache weise ist kinderleicht.

Versuchen Sie mal, die folgende kurze Strecke zu importieren und öffnen Sie sie im den Locus Routenplaner. Ich sollte doch erwähnen, dass die Unterstützung von Shaping Points in Locus sowohl in der Navigation als auch in den gpx export dateien nicht in angebot ist.

Sowohl das Shaping als auch die Via Point unterstützung über die Web Planner export datei (und in der app navigation) sind nicht vorhanden.
Diese vom der benutzer erstellten Planer wegpunkte sind jedoch die grundlegenden arbeitspunkte, mit denen Sie später idealerweise weiter arbeiten müssen.

Web-Planer bieten immer noch keine bessere unterstützung für transfers der "Shaping Points" oder der so sehr nützliche (TTS) angekündigte "Via Points".

Current GPX link is invalid

I will ask and inform the RouteYou dev. When I know more I will report back.

See Image 1
Menion if you can't get it work(link) no problem.
See Image 2
Selection by file browser as shown opens the link.
Anyway you really do no need to spend more time in it.
The text desc now looks nice = most important.

Open the file in the Locus route planner. There you can add an extra planner Via Point. (=Blue Square). You can eventually set create Via Points by default.  Or if you see a planner Shaping Pont (=Green triangle) click on it and change to Via Point. Give the so created Via Point eventually a customised name.
Save and export as .fit file.  (I do no use...but that should do the job..you test) 
Find info about tcx here: https://t.ly/SOAy    (By the way .fit files do not support "Notes" as tcx does but have some extra turn info)

The tcx export is correct. (Text readable format)
The Locus fit export is possibly corrupt. (Binary format, so I can't check..only the dev can)
Workaround can be export as tcx and than convert this by external pc program.
The Javawa RTW tool will do the job correctly.  https://www.javawa.nl/rtwtool.html

[exact]

"After sending the route"
"I attached a screenshot"

One cause I may think off. Your extra waypoints added are NOT associated with a trackpoint.
Associated means: Must have the exact same position and exact same timestamp.  ( A clone)
Then for Locus they should show up into the Locus Planner as Via Points. If not, than they are just ordinary free positioned waypoints. (Not supported by .fit nor by .tcx)

[Merge]

Works in Locus Pro.  V3.56.5 . You checked set Merge points at import dialog ?

Still works as usual and correctly. See attachment: Laarne - 2.5km.gpx

https://help.locusmap.eu/topic/26993-new-update-cannot-import-multiple-gpx-at-once#comment-108513

However, there may be more unpleasant surprises to come ?
As Google still is trying to improve Android to the point where it becomes almost impossible to use.

Tasker ?  Fine. Roger

I don't use Tasker anyway.
Therefore this alternative.
Multiple choice is nice, isn't it?
That is all. Roger?