Messages

yes this is possible (maybe) but problem remain. What when you hide this button in "set right panel"? What when you'll have on right panel more buttons and you'll have to slide these buttons so some should be hidden? ...

NO, je to celkem jednoduchá odpověd. Na výpočet je nutné být online i v Pro i v Free, v tom není žádný rozdíl. Výpočet probíhá na OSM serverech akže proto. Nicméně výpočet mi vráti jen seznam lomových bodů podle kterých pak kreslím čáru ale nic mi neříká o tom, kde je jaká křižovatka, odbočka, co je jen zatáčka atd, takže já bohužel nemůžu volit kde pípnout protože o lomových bodech nevím vůbec nic!
  Ten výběr auto, cyklo atd. je jen pro způsob výpočtu trasy. Takže pro auto by to mělo vzít silnice, pro pěší i nějaké cesty ...

Hi,
  yes I understand but that's not how this works. At time t=10s, gps is turned on and let's say it immediately get new location.. This location is set in Locus as "last valid location". This location is then sended to track recording object and he test it on all parameters. Time between last location is less then 15s so no point is stored. Next action is in 20s!, GPS is turned on, new valid location. This is tested, is bigger then 15s so this place is stored. In 30s, new location is taken by GPS but it's only 10s against last stored location (which was stored in 20s) so it's not saved!

  so this all works in way, that everytime GPS obtain new location, it send this to every running function in locus and this function take care about it. So settings (1) says how often will be sended this new location into system. Other values in track recording preferences take care about these new locations but not in time for example every 15s as you wrote, but in time that GPS sended signal to Locus by settings (1). Clear?

i like but i'm not sure about it. I think there is missing some "indicator". When you tap on this button and all POI disapear, where you can see that you used this button and you have enabled some items? Hmm have to think about it ...

perfect, this is surely possible! New tab or new button at bottom will be added! nice, looks that this "problem" will be finally solved without any "hack" or ... They write they they will publish some testing PQ file during next weeks, so when I forgot to test and ad it in next weeks, please remind me it ...

I around a week wrote to groundspeak around this. If they will allow me to use this API, I'm sure them me or Arcao will create addon with online capability!

thanks jusc, I know I know. For a "few" people, Locus is too complicated. Thanks, I'll probably do something with this ...

this is nice idea, and should be very useful mainly for viewing already downloaded maps etc. but I really do not have time for this. But .. never knows

Hi and welcome back

to be true, I do not fully understand. If I understand correctly, you want one full zoom level and one only around caches?

About altitude fill - you're welcome. I tested it during trip last days and as you say ... very usable

About second part. I do not interpolate any points. I just fill data to every point in track. Anyway I used "Create new track" mode together with ability to compute track by YOURS service (online), so I had full track with all important points and I filled this path with altitude. Anyway if you create path completely by your own, I suggest to place one point below hill and second on top of hill to have better elevation profile

so you want to remember value of "locked zoom" level? So everytime you press "Zoom lock" button, zoom will switch to last value? Am I understand correctly?

Hi Matthias, are you using this function often? This is sure possible to add this to settings, question is if this settings will be usable only for you or not . I use rotation also, but it's fast enough to tap twice on screen and I don't see a problem in it. But it depend ...

hi, try to uninstall older version first. this may help

I'm not home ... Tapatalk used ...

nono there is no chance to actually change limit of downloading threads. And you're correct. Downloading on PC is of course faster. Question is if time you have to invest for this, cannot be invested better . But it's up to you. Good luck

I'm glad you're happy anyway there is already "Nex point" command ...