Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - popej

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Troubles & Questions / Re: maps on my SD - locus problems
« on: April 05, 2015, 20:05:31 »
Locus already follow this rule as one of options.
Thanks. I was surprised by amount of complains (not about Locus), while there exist a solution for SD problem.

2
Troubles & Questions / Re: maps on my SD - locus problems
« on: April 04, 2015, 01:23:32 »
As I understand, each program on KitKat gets own directory on SD, where it can freely write its data. Quote from https://source.android.com/devices/storage/index.html : "For example, the app with package name com.example.foo can now freely access Android/data/com.example.foo/ on external storage devices with no permissions."

Is it false statement or there are other factors, that forbid Locus to follow this rule?

3
Site for downloading SRTM v3 is here:
https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/data_access/data_pool/

Direct links to SRTM1 look like this:
http://e4ftl01.cr.usgs.gov/SRTM/SRTMGL1.003/2000.02.11/N49E020.SRTMGL1.hgt.zip

And to SRTM3:
http://e4ftl01.cr.usgs.gov/SRTM/SRTMGL3.003/2000.02.11//N49E020.SRTMGL3.hgt.zip


FYI server shows following warning at directory listing:

                         U.S. GOVERNMENT COMPUTER

This US Government computer is for authorized users only.  By accessing this
system you are consenting to complete monitoring with no expectation of privacy.
Unauthorized access or use may subject you to disciplinary action and criminal
prosecution.

5
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: January 20, 2015, 18:16:02 »
I have cleaned a bit my scripts, that I use for adding marked trails to OSM data and published them on my site,
see file trails-for-locus.7z:
http://www.gmaptool.eu/en/content/locus-poland-osm

I hope someone could find them useful.

6
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: October 31, 2014, 01:50:58 »
New version of my map: http://www.gmaptool.eu/en/content/locus-poland-osm

I have changed "instance" tags, now trails are grouped in 4 categories, for each category there is a "instance" tags. New tags are following:
"instance:cycle" for bicycle and mtb trails,
"instance:hiking" for hiking, foot, walking and nordic_walking trails,
"instance:winter" for ski, piste and sled trails,
"instance:other" for other trails like horse trails.

Values for "instance" keys remain the same - "2" to "9" and "x".

7
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: October 27, 2014, 13:09:53 »
@ Popej, maybe the solution is to put bike routes in one bag like this "instance:bicycle"?
No problem. Just test a bit current version and then precise your requirements, I'll adopt ;)

8
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: October 27, 2014, 12:57:37 »
@ Popej, I made some test and here's a problem I'm experiencing. Bike routes should be on "one side" not dependend on road direction but here's a result :
Nobody's perfect ;)
I don't make a full analysis of relation, I assume that relation is created correctly as an ordered list of ways. I follow this order and swap direction of ways as necessary. In your example relation has its ways out of order, which breaks analysis.

I also hoped we could have bicycle routes at only one side (on the right side of direction) and hiking/foot routes on the left side. Now they appear randomly on right or left.
This requirement is in conflict with continuous lines. You can't have both at once.

9
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: October 25, 2014, 17:46:48 »
I have updated my map of Poland:
http://www.gmaptool.eu/en/content/locus-poland-osm

Map include some new tags, as requested by Wojtas82.

Marked tralis are drawn without swapping direction on successive ways.

For bicycle routes with icn/ncn/rcn/icn network I have added new tags: "instance:icn", "instance:ncn", "instance:rcn", "instance:lcn". These tags indicate second and next trail drawn on a way. Values for tags can be: [2..9,x], where "x" means 10-th and next instances. These tags can be used to change graphics or text position for multiple trails.

10
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: October 21, 2014, 22:57:48 »
17 bicycle trails on a single way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224177777
How do you draw it on a map? ;)

11
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: October 20, 2014, 22:50:21 »
How difficult? Like one evening and a little more? ;)
Problem is that I have some other task to complete and some books to read.

12
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: October 20, 2014, 16:08:45 »
The solution would be to process trails, merge parts and swap direction for some parts. A bit complicated with tools I'm using for Locus but not impossible. But does "dy" option work for current Locus version?

13
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: October 14, 2014, 17:33:00 »
I have tunned my maps to standard Locus theme. I don't provide "osmc:symbol" but I split its value to 3 tags: osmc_color, osmc_foreground and osmc_background.

I could preserve entire osmc:symbol too, but it could be too complicated to analyze in theme. Or I could add more tags, like osmc_foreground2, osmc_text, osmc_textcolor.

What tags do you expect?

14
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: October 14, 2014, 15:27:46 »
If I add some tags for second and next routes, then you cold define different for them, for example put an offset to trail name/ref.

Your theme won't work, value "osmc_color" (or "network" in my example), can't have 2 values at once. Sorry for misleading you.



15
Themes - Vector maps / Re: Theme developing question
« on: October 14, 2014, 12:00:54 »
<rule e="way" k="network" v="iwn AND nwn">
2 conditions should form AND:
<rule e="way" k="network" v="iwn">
   <rule e="way" k="network" v="nwn">

But you won't find that kind of routes on my maps.

I have 2 ideas about multiple routes on one way:
- add some artificial tag, like "instance=2" or "instance:lcn=2" on second route,
- draw second route in opposite direction,

I'd rather prefer first idea, this won't change anything in OSM data.

Pages: [1] 2 3