I think Saturo is right, the Tiramisu Velo Theme has to be changed to also show highway=path + bicycle=designated at least.
In OSM, a path is any way which is not meant for motorized traffic. This must not necessarily be a small path in the woods.
See OSM Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath -> "Usage as a universal Tag"
It's also used for combined foot- and cycleways. Both of Saturos examples seem to be such combined ways (note that he changed the tagging to highway=cycleway in the meantime, which might be incorrect).
You can find many of such ways:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=way%0A%20%20%5Bhighway%3Dpath%5D%0A%20%20%5Bbicycle%3Ddesignated%5D%0A%20%20%5Bfoot%3Ddesignated%5D%0A%20%20(%7B%7Bbbox%7D%7D)%3B%0A(._%3B%3E%3B)%3B%0Aout%3B&C=49.7204;11.08559;14
If there is no cycle route going over it, these ways are invisible in Tiramisu Velo, although perfectly suitable for bikes.
In OSM, a path is any way which is not meant for motorized traffic. This must not necessarily be a small path in the woods.
See OSM Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath -> "Usage as a universal Tag"
It's also used for combined foot- and cycleways. Both of Saturos examples seem to be such combined ways (note that he changed the tagging to highway=cycleway in the meantime, which might be incorrect).
You can find many of such ways:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=way%0A%20%20%5Bhighway%3Dpath%5D%0A%20%20%5Bbicycle%3Ddesignated%5D%0A%20%20%5Bfoot%3Ddesignated%5D%0A%20%20(%7B%7Bbbox%7D%7D)%3B%0A(._%3B%3E%3B)%3B%0Aout%3B&C=49.7204;11.08559;14
If there is no cycle route going over it, these ways are invisible in Tiramisu Velo, although perfectly suitable for bikes.
The following users thanked this post: Andrew Heard