Locus Map - forum

Support => Troubles & Questions => Topic started by: Andrew Heard on February 28, 2019, 07:13:36

Title: why would the route in this GPX not show elevations?
Post by: Andrew Heard on February 28, 2019, 07:13:36
The attached GPX file was generated by RWGPS. It contains <ele> data but Locus track statistics & chart show no elevations. Why? Other similar files are fine.
Title: Re: why would the route in this GPX not show elevations?
Post by: menion on February 28, 2019, 13:50:18
Good day Andrew,
nice "bug". Your track has a minimal value equal to "0", so Locus detect this as an invalid value and refuse to display it. Fixed, thanks.
Title: Re: why would the route in this GPX not show elevations?
Post by: Andrew Heard on March 01, 2019, 01:09:29
Good day Andrew,
nice "bug". Your track has a minimal value equal to "0", so Locus detect this as an invalid value and refuse to display it. Fixed, thanks.
where is this  minimal value equal to "0"? All the elevations seem OK to me, eg (start of file):
Code: [Select]
      <trkpt lat="-42.886764" lon="147.331907">
        <ele>12.1</ele>
      </trkpt>
      <trkpt lat="-42.886663" lon="147.331929">
        <ele>11.7</ele>
      </trkpt>
      <trkpt lat="-42.886662" lon="147.331929">
        <ele>11.7</ele>
      </trkpt>
      <trkpt lat="-42.886657" lon="147.331864">
        <ele>11.7</ele>
      </trkpt>
Just curious.
Title: Re: why would the route in this GPX not show elevations?
Post by: Christian on March 01, 2019, 23:50:41
eg line 577 - 589.
I had this case an year ago also.
Title: Re: why would the route in this GPX not show elevations?
Post by: menion on March 02, 2019, 16:13:16
Were you looking correctly Andrew? :)

Title: Re: why would the route in this GPX not show elevations?
Post by: Andrew Heard on March 05, 2019, 04:44:42
@menion - those elevations are valid - bridge/ sea level. As you say - now fixed.

For example line 576 - https://www.google.com.au/maps/@-42.86539,147.33802,21z.