Hi menion,
this option didn´t work for me :-[
Hello balloni, tested and ... working.
Any screenshot for me? At least something to start with ...
Quote from: menion on July 29, 2015, 18:52:32
Any screenshot for me? At least something to start with ...
sure ;D
in first screenshot you see on left side PQ sorted by name :), in next step i sort it by geocaching/GCVote and get screenshot on right side. Red numbers are the votes and they are not sorted :-[
in second screenshot you see on left side PQ sorted by geocaching/Favorit :), in next step i sort it by geocaching/GCVote and get screenshot on right side. They are also not sorted :-[ and additional in another sequence :o
Sorry, at the moment i am not able to add images to my post, so i attached image files and also used PQ
Hmm from what I understand you want to sort caches by amount of votes? But caches are sorted by votes rating, not amount of received votes. So cache with one 4 star rating will be sorted before cache with ten, 3-start ratings ... this is how it always worked
QuoteSo cache with one 4 star rating will be sorted before cache with ten, 3-start ratings ... this is how it always worked
thanks, now i get it ;), so for me this star vote result isn´t significant ::)
a small question remains, why i get different sorting result depending this list was sorted before ?
hmm you may confirm "voting" quality (amount of votes) simply by tam on cache after sorting, so I think vote values are useful as are ...
And different sorting ... I think it it because list of loaded caches is re-used and in case, voting values are same, result may be a little bit different sorting. I've anyway improved it, so it should be always sorted in same order in next version, thanks.
Quotesimply by tam on cache after sorting
sorry can´t translate and so din´t understand your sentence :-[
ah sorry, tam = "tap". I wanted to say, that when you see in list, that cache has 4.5 stars, you may tap on cache and in first tab, you will see number of GC votes before a star. I'm anyway sure you know this.
Thanks 8) and yes i know ;)