Messages

Ich stimme Graf Geo voll zu. Habe neben LM Pro auch Gold gekauft. Die App ist den Preis voll wert. Wenn ich schaue, für was ich während des Jahres Geld ausgebe, kommt es darauf auch nicht an.

...
Danke, kannst du da mal ein Beispiel als Screenshot zeigen

Ich habe mir Cachebox im playstore angeschaut und bei den Screenshots Augenkrebs gekriegt. Quietschbunt und verspielt. Nix für mich.
LM kann sehr viel, aber zum Cachen nehme ich c:geo und LM nur ergänzend, z. B. um zu einem Cache zu navigieren. Und für die Navigation im Auto nehme ich auch was anderes. Das ist auch kein Problem, meine Emails schreibe ich ja auch nicht mit LM.

@Saturo: ob man das Abomodell akzeptiert oder nicht, muss natürlich jede/r für sich entscheiden. Ich sehe meine Goldmitgliedschaft erstmal als Spende, um die Entwickler für ihre Arbeit zu unterstützen. Momentan würde auch mir der Ist-Zustand von LMpro völlig ausreichen.
Ich nutze LMpro seit 7 Jahren (damals 7,50 €) und die App wurde seitdem gewaltig weiterentwickelt, ohne dass es mich einen Cent mehr gekostet hätte. Das kann auf Dauer nicht funktionieren. Also kann ich das Abomodell für LM4 absolut nachvollziehen, irgendwo von müssen und sollen die Entwickler ja leben. Besser als wenn LM irgendwann mangels Einnahmen eingestellt werden müsste.
Dass LMpro weiter gepflegt und genutzt werden kann, ist doch super fair. Und falls LM4 in Zukunft den (nun gestiegenen) Erwartungen nicht entsprechen sollte, kann man ja jederzeit kündigen.
Die Zweigleisigkeit ist somit schon ok. LMpro für Einmalzahlung, LM4 für Abo.

Find inspiration here. Has streetname info and multiple route select.
https://www.plotaroute.com/makemearoute
Registration is free and you already get 3 free test attempts.
Download as gpx track + waypoints > Select Directions. (Locus compatible)
https://www.plotaroute.com/makemearoute

Verstuurd vanaf mijn Mi A2 Lite met Tapatalk

Thank you for this link!
I like the way they calculate the ETA, it's something Locus (app and web) needs to improve.

ROUND TRIP:
I used to play with the "round trip" feature, but after the first wow effect I decided it was absolutely useless. Who would ever rely on a random rotation function around a point?
It is not possible to define preferences of any kind, be they historical, naturalistic or cultural, so rather than relying on a random function my choice at a crossroads would be that of the road I like best, at least it would be based on my choices.
Unless real utility can be found for this feature, integrating it with the options I wrote above (and all the complications of the case), it should be removed, useful and solid functionality better than things like this that do nothing but generate doubts in users.
Those who use a GPS and map device usually want to rely on certainties, not on a roll of the dice.
But this is just my thought, maybe someone else found it useful, but for now I haven't seen a single post.

Thanks guys. I've probably found the error. Will try to publish a new version today (in the worst case tomorrow).

In a tracks context, the possibility to create embedded waypoints is needed and expected here (by me at least).

I've also always been arguing for adding that to the Track Editor, but Menion doesn't seem to believe in adding waypoints to tracks once they finished recording
Would be happy to be wrong, though...

Do I understand correctly. You want to make a waypoint to a track point. I do not desert for what. Do you have an example?

Well, "Waypoints" tab is part of all tracks. I use them all the time to mark special points and events during a recording. Same could be "general" POIs like "Restaurant", but some like "took off crampons here" are specific to the track. So waypoints make a lot of sense. And sometimes you forget them during recording, but you would like to add them later. While you can do that in the waypoint tab, they now don't have a timestamp anymore, which in cases like my example above are of interest. So adding a waypoint directly to a (timestamped) trackpoint makes a lot of sense. And from reading the threads here, I'm not the only one wishing for this...

But what I think about the track point. I create many track points (per language). To maintain OSM later. After uploading, I delete them all again. But I always have to select and delete each one individually (delete also confirm). Please make all selectable.

Agreed.

Few more things about the new track details:



• Thx for making the description selectable & copyable, as I asked for! While you're at it, why not make the title selectable, too?
• As has been noted above, simply having the waypoint icons there is, well, not so helpful. Tapping them should at least show their name, or even center them on screen.
• Also as noted above, wouldn't mind the description below the title. To save space without the header "Description", and perhaps only max. 2 lines, with a clickable "<more>" to expand if longer
• Some customization would be nice - I for example would like to slim it down by removing "Best interval"
• The crossing lines for the "current point" are nice to better gues the values - but why not display the actual values directly, too: "432m / 6.1km".
• I know, the left-most button takes you directly to the current trackpoint - but there should be the opposite, taking you back to the track.
Just my 2 cents - probably you already have some of those things in mind...

Question:
what happen with installed
- PRO
and
- LOCUS MAP GOLD
if i install this BETA with apk???

[Austria]

There's a new version (v2) of DTM Austria, my oldest DTM. Therefor I downloaded the latest LiDAR source data of Austria's federal states.

Additionally I created 2 models with finer resolutions (10m and 0.5"). These fine gridded models will kept limited to Austria.

https://data.opendataportal.at/dataset/dtm-austria

[@lor74cas]

Hi,
@lor74cas
Elevation data for routing: we have altered brouter internals to use our company maintained dataset, which combines enhanced SRTM source (viewfinderpanorama) and some Lidar sources. However the resolution is 3'' only.

I therefore suggest you to update the data with the more detailed ones at 1 "where available. Your servers will not suffer from a few more gigs of space occupied and a few more seconds of CPU usage, but you will give a more accurate data to everyone.
In my experience of use, 3 "is sufficient for road use (car, bike), but in the mountains 1" is better if, for example, you walk on the edge of a mountain ridge.
After all, the app allows the use of 1 "srtm (for the user it is only a matter of space occupied) on the cloud / web instead we should always have the best option.

Should this topic be locked to prevent further posts now there is official 4.0 - https://forum.locusmap.eu/index.php?topic=7273?

@lor74cas
The offline LoMaps in LM4 are the same as used to be in LM3. The incorrect priority or wrap of text labels is a quite an old issue - still not ideal. The size of the text should represent the priority of the POIs - we can discuss it, but probably in a separate topic

The online LoMaps are updated continuously, let say about every 10 days. The offline every 2 - 3 months

"Track rec visibility - auto hide"
Set via presets. Rec. button does not hide, at least while recording.

Isn't that exactly what you want? Optionally hide it when it's not recording, but when it is, keep it in view?

My understanding, too.

"Track rec visibility - auto hide"
Set via presets. Rec. button does not hide, at least while recording.

Isn't that exactly what you want? Optionally hide it when it's not recording, but when it is, keep it in view?

Hi, regarding more generic qualities of places: there already are "attributes" - icons and short verbal description of features like WLAN access, wheelchair accessibility, smoking ... these are visible in the point detail, if present at all (in well mapped areas there are more of them). Diet is already somehow expressed by icons (veg. is "V", non veg. is "fork and knife"). Anyway being more specific about cuisine would be good, I agree. Probably a feature to do for next version of the database.