Messages

There's an update 4.19.0.2 on Gdrive, 17th Oct.

Thx - Educational and hospital buildings get a distinct color here, blue. A rather unnecessary option. Just "Schools" sounds like the building is not displayed if unchecked.

v1.3.2

• Track grade codes now as a setting
• Indicators for unpaved roads (new setting)

Track grades, see screenshot. OSM grades go from 1 to 5. 1=no marker, 2-3=one marker, 4=two markers, 5=three markers.

Yes, I'm just not 100% fine with the dashed lines. May change. I wish with mapsforge I could paint e.g. zigzag lines.
Yes, re:"Tapio", Forest is where I feel at home... and Tapiola/Sibelius is one of my most favourite pieces of music.

I've added an option. Not in the release yet.
https://github.com/TapioOfTapiola/oam_theme_tapiola/blob/main/Tapiola.xml

3 weeks before I can provide further info or discuss/ check issues.

OK... and now I noticed, in your example the logic is vice versa, you are marking the unsealed road.

Ok, experiments... the problem is consistency. 51.324,7.98681 in Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.

Screenshot has mostly Highway:Residential, but road surface is only defined for some of them... (asphalt, the ones with blue lines).

Attached xml line 1929+

Does it make sense stiill? Please test in your area. I can add another option "Sealed road indicators" and default it to off.
And if so, do you really think those indicators should be on higher level roads, (highway:primary etc)?

I think it shouldn't be used in residential areas. I.e. just used for v="track|byway|road|path|unclassified"

One suggestion is to distinguish the road/ track surface eg. between sealed & unsealed.

Hi Andrew, let's please discuss this here. OK, I looked at your test position at -42.51336, 147.64366 in Tasmania.

There I don't see the need to check for road surfaces...? At least for Germany roads k=highway v=primary/secondary/tertiary (in my theme from yellow to dark orange) already imply they will be an asphalt road. Do you think an extra layer, like a dashed line is useful and necessary?
Smaller roads/paths may be in need of your idea. If you have an example position, let me know.

v1.3.1

• Size increase of oneway arrows
• Bugfix military area
• Military area olive green overlay and setting

Thx Karlchick, very helpful. @Andrew Heard, sorry, totally missed your posting #6, will have a closer look at some point. Currently I just use 3 stages of markers (none, 1 or 2) for the GRADE1-5 path attribute, which is quite interesting for me in hiking.
And some "asphalt/concrete/etc" attribute.

I am a bit hesitant in that fields because surface and quality attributes are inconsistent and numerous.

v1.3.0

• Minor changes.

E.g., removed the fading of schools/hospital which now always appear blue (if option for special building types is turned on).

Not much progress because I'm quite fine with the theme rn. I should add a fancy icon and a legend though... 🥴

Which item is it in the expert settings. Haven't found anything in a hurry ?

"Fluent movement" in the english translation.

Und bei mir wiederum fehlt Galileo.

Verstehe den Artikel bzgl. Mate 20 nicht. Die frohlocken, L1/L5 und E1/E5a wären unterstützt, was aus dem Screenshot nicht hervorgeht.

Für mein Mate20X sieht es wie folgt aus (bin im Gebäude)... also habe ich wohl Dualband:

Is the "reversed mileage marks" related to my suggestion https://help.locusmap.eu/topic/30858-display-distance-markers-in-reverse?
You cannot view this attachment.

Oh, seems so, nice feature! IMO the implementation is perfect. Just reverse, no additional option.